July 4, 2005
"...We
come on the ship they call the Mayflower
We come on the ship that sailed the moon
We come in the age's most uncertain hours
and sing an American tune..."
- Partial lyrics from an edit of the song
"American Tune" , by Paul Simon
"........It was midsummer by the time the first troops from outside
New England began showing up, companies of riflemen from
Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia, ' hardy men, many of
them exceeding six feet in height,' noted Dr. James Thacher,
who was himself short and slight.
One Virginia company, led by Captain Daniel
Morgan, had
marched on a ' bee-line ' for Boston, covering six hundred
miles in three weeks, or an average of thirty miles a day in
the heat of summer.
Mostly backwoodsmen of Scotch-Irish descent, they wore
long, fringed hunting shirts, ' rifle shirts ' of homespun linen,
in colors ranging from undyed tan and grey to shades of brown
and even black, these tied at the waist with belts carrying
tomahawks. At a review they demonstrated how, with their
long-barreled rifles, a frontier weapon made in Pennsylvania
and largely unknown in New England, they could hit a mark
seven inches in diameter at a distance of 250 yards, while the
ordinary musket was accurate at only 100 yards or so. It was
' rifling ' -- spiraled grooves inside the long barrel-- that
increased the accuracy, and the new men began firing at
British sentries with deadly effect, until the British caught
on and kept their heads down or stayed out of range.
Welcome as they were at first, the riflemen soon proved
even more indifferent to discipline than the New Englanders,
and obstreperous to the point that Washington began to wish
they had never come....
.....At the center, where Hessian artillery had been bombarding
Sullivan's lines along the ridges since early morning, General
von Heister's brigades could be seen drawn up on the plain to
the south, but showed no sign of moving. Three Hessian
brigades stood waiting in a line nearly a mile long.
Sullivan had ridden out from Brooklyn to take
command at
the Flatbush Pass. Seeing that the Hessians were not moving
and that Stirling was in trouble on the right, he sent some of
his regiments to help.
Until nine o'clock the battle seemed to be unfolding about
as the Americans had expected, with the enemy attacking, or
poised to attack, head-on.
But at nine came the crash of Howe's signal guns, and
suddenly Sullivan realized that a whole British army was coming
at him from behind and that he was surrounded.
On the plain beyond the ridge, General von Heister gave the
order and with drums rolling, the Hessians were in motion.
Leaving his advance guard posted along the ridge to do what
they could to hold off the Hessians, Sullivan pulled back his
main force and swung around to face the oncoming British
ranks. And though vastly outnumbered, the Americans
returned the British fire with murderous effect. Officers on
both sides feared their men would be cut to pieces, and
officers and soldiers on both sides often had no idea what
was happening. Nor was it the Americans only who, when
faced with annihilation, ran for their lives.
A British light infantry officer who led thirty of Clinton's
advance guard into the ' very thick ' of several hundred
American riflemen, saw a third of his men go down in the
most ferocious exchange of fire he had ever known. When
he and half a dozen redcoats broke for the woods, more
rebels sprang up out of nowhere. The fire seemed to come
from every direction.
' I called to my men to run to the first wall they could
find and we all set off, some into some short bushes,
others straight across a field [and] in running across
the field we [were] exposed to the fire of 300 men.
We had literally run out in the midst [ of them ] and
they calling to me to surrender. I stopped twice to look
behind me and saw the riflemen so thick and not one
of my own men. I made for the wall as hard as I could
drive and they peppering at me...at last I gained the
wall and threw myself headlong. '
In the turmoil and confusion, Sullivan struggled to hold
control and keep his men from panicking. Their situation
was desperate; retreat was the only alternative, and in
stages of ' fight and flight ' , he lead them as rapidly as
possible in the direction of the Brooklyn lines...
...The attack began just after eight o'clock. The Americans
under Nathaniel Greene came out of the woods and across
a field through driving snow about half a mile from town.
They were moving fast, at what was called a ' long trot '.
The Hessians on guard on the Pennington Road had
trouble at first making out who they were and how many
there were. ' The storm continued with great violence,' Henry
Knox wrote, ' but was in our backs, and consequently in the
faces of the enemy.'
The Americans opened fire. The Hessians waited for them
to get closer, then fired and began quickly, smoothly falling
back into town, exactly as they had been trained to do when
retreat was the only choice. Washington thought they per-
formed particularly well keeping up a steady retreating fire.
As Greene's and Sullivan's columns converged on the
town, Washington moved to high ground nearby on the
north where he tried to keep watch on what was happening.
His 2,400 Americans, having been on their feet all night,
wet, cold, their weapons soaked, went into the fight as if
everything depended on them. Each man ' seemed to vie
with the other in pressing forward, ' Washington wrote.
In town the Hessians came rushing out of their houses
and barracks into the streets. Drums beat, the band played,
officers shouted orders in German, and as fast as the
Hessians began forming up, Knox's artillery were in position
at the head of King and Queen streets.
The cannon opened fire with deadly effect down hundreds
of yards on each street, and in minutes-- ' in the twinkling of
an eye,' Knox said--cleared the streets.
When the Hessians retreated into the side streets, they
found Sullivan's men coming at them with fixed bayonets.
For a brief time, a thousand or more Americans and Hessians
were locked in a savage house-to-house fighting
It was all happening extremely fast, in wild confusion and
swirling snow made more blinding by clouds of gunpowder
smoke. ' The storm of nature and the storm of the town,'
wrote Nathaniel Greene, ' exhibited a scene that filled the
mind during the action with passions easier conceived than
described.'
When the Hessians rolled out a field gun midway on King
Street, a half dozen Virginians led by Captain William
Washington ( a distant cousin of the commander ) and
Lieutenant James Monroe rushed forward, seized it, and
turned it on them.
Colonel Rall, who had been rousted from his bed and was
quickly on horseback and in command in the midst of the
fray, ordered a charge. Men were being hit all around him.
The line faltered. He ordered a retreat into an orchard at the
southeastern edge of town. Then Rall, too, was hit and fell
from his horse. Mortally wounded, he was picked up and
carried to the Potts house.
The Hessians in the orchard, finding themselves
surrounded, lay down their arms and surrendered...."
-Excerpts from the book "1776", by
David McCullough, describing scenes
related to battles around Boston,
New York, and Trenton in that pivotal
year.
To All,
McCullough's book is a great work, eminently more "readable" than the tomes of
some others that go unmentioned. But perhaps some of the black powder
enthusiasts out there could do a demonstration for the author as to the accuracy
of the Short Land Pattern "Brown Bess" musket out past 50 yards, for the sake of
historical accuracy.
In other
news:
Spread the Word:
The Rochester Democrat and Chronicle posted a "guest essay" by Staff
Sergeant Chad Stern, 10th Mountain Division, U.S. Army today, and the UK
Telegraph is posting a story about "red-on-red" fire in Anbar Province in
Western Iraq. In both cases, the stories highlight that things are not as dire
as the Lamestream Media or Congressional Liberals would have them seem.
Sergeant Stern has just returned from duty in Iraq, and is part of that tide of
service personnel wondering why the media is failing to present some of the more
positive aspects of the current situation in Iraq. He recounts about his daily
interactions with Iraqis, and their appreciation for being liberated. His
personal assistance to a destitute family, including a donation of more than $
300.00 out of his pocket, is an example of compassion that many of us would be
hard put to emulate. With soldiers like these in service, it is hard to imagine
failure of the current mission.
And perhaps the payoff is not so far away from coming, if the UK Telegraph's
story is accurate. It seems that the "insurrectionists" in Iraq, the foreign
terrorist-cum-fighters that in a more just world would be labeled
"counter-revolutionaries" by an unbiased Fourth Estate, are getting shot at by
native Iraqis.
Apparently the locals do not have an appreciation for Taliban-style rule, which
results in summary punishments and a level of technological lifestyle comparable
to that of the time of the Third Crusade. Add to that an assassination of a
respected tribal leader, and it may just be that Iraqis are "standing up" (to
paraphrase the President) at much faster rate that previously disclosed in the
New York Times.
In both instances, the information being forwarded from Iraq does not seem to
match the situation one would normally equate with Senator Kennedy's "quagmire"
estimate. While it is perhaps understandable that the Liberal's Oldest Bull
would denigrate the work of American service personnel for political reasons, it
does not mean that the press should accept the Senator's representations at face
value. Perhaps with time, the good Senator could hoist himself into a transport
to Iraq and go and ask the newly liberated as to how they feel about the passing
of Saddam's regime.
Links may
be found at:
http://www.democratandchronicle.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?
AID=/20050704/OPINION02/507040329/1039/OPINION
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/07/04/
wirq04.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/07/04/ixworld.html
No
More Bullets Update:
Jordan Rau of the Los Angeles Times wrote yesterday about the current Battles
Royale in Sacramento over SB 357 and AB 352.
With AB 352 and it's requirement of serializing of ammunition cases, a key
threat is more it's classification of un-serialized pistols as unsafe than it's
easily defeated serialization imprint. The whole population of pre-serialized
pistols in California could become fodder for the torts community should a
homeowner choose to avail themselves of the right of self-defense in his or her
own living room.
But in an interesting "elaboration" as to the efficacy of ammunition
serialization as proposed by SB 357, Rau maintains that the DOJ's Randi Rossi
has been shooting serialized test projectiles through additional media besides
the previously disclosed junk car doors. The new subject media now includes
drywall, wood "walls", and gelatin (No distinction is made as to whether it is
industrial quality at a controlled temperature and distance, or that Rossi
simply went down to the local cafeteria and absconded with a few bowls of Jello.).
But the original problems of SB 357 remain unaddressed by either Rossi's DOJ or
Rau of the Times. It is clear from the DOJ's own material that they have not yet
presented test data on pistol calibers smaller than 9mm as to the survivability
of the coding system concept under proposal (It's not so clear that the San
Bernardino Sheriff's Department did any testing in support of SB 357 themselves,
despite the allegations by the Times' Rau and the DOJ presentation). And since a
key requirement of SB 357 is that the serial numbers survive impact after
discharge, it stands to reason that non-exempt projectiles that cannot survive
impact will not be permissible under the rules the DOJ will eventually
promulgate.
As such, .22 caliber rimfire and a host of "green" ammunition products could all
be effectively banned due to SB 357. .22 rounds commonly deform to the point of
not being able to match bullets to recorded rifling marks when recovered during
autopsy. And "green" (frangible) ammunition fragments on impact, not leaving
enough readable substrate to recover one number let alone a code sequence usable
in a court of law.
Normally, testing of ammunition for law enforcement approval purposes requires
elaborate (read comprehensive and costly) testing where manufacturers expect to
offset development costs with future sales. With significant numbers of the
state's law enforcement buying their ammunition through retail outlets, they
will be significantly impacted by any retreat of any individual manufacturer
from the California market (If clean air gasoline is a comparable model of how
it will go should SB 357 be enacted, a number of "smaller" ammunition
manufacturers will drop out of the market due to cost pressures). That can only
mean higher costs for all customers, law enforcement as well as the shooting
public. That, in turn would be in addition to the proposed fees charged by the
state to offset administrative costs (subject to cost escalation factors).
Since law enforcement has to have ammunition to perform it's function, SB 357
will at the minimum drive up expenses to departments across the state. It will
likely result in a ban of critical training and specialty ammunition needed by
law enforcement for proficiency mandated by the public. And it will have almost
no effect in helping DOJ solve crimes from the comfort of their computer
terminals, given that non-serialized ammunition will become yet another
illegally trafficked item on the black market.
The
Attorney General and his Firearms Division staffers should know this. Whether
they care about it or not is an entirely different issue.
Links may
be found at:
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-bullets3jul03,0,5416514.story?
coll=la-home-local
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/
sb_357_bill_20050622_amended_asm.html
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_0351-0400/
ab_352_bill_20050516_amended_asm.html
Respectfully,
SFVMC-NRA
Copyright 2005 Anthony Canales
All
rights reserved.