Point of Contact: Jim Moody
213 485 4061
Dear Chief Bratton,
I, a U.S. citizen, own Barrett Firearms Mfg. Inc., and for 20 years I have
built .50 caliber rifles for my fellow citizens, for their Law Enforcement
departments and for their nation's armed forces.
You may be aware of the latest negative misinformation campaign from a
Washington based
anti-gun group, the Violence Policy Center. The VPC has, for three or so
years, been
unsuccessful in Washington, D.C. trying to demonize and ban a new subclass
of firearms, the
.50 caliber and other "too powerful" rifles. This type of nibbling process
has been
historically successful in civilian disarmament of other nations governed
by totalitarian and
other regimes less tolerant of individual rights than the United States .
The VPC's most recent efforts directs this misinformation campaign at your
state, attempting
to get any California body to pass any law against .50 caliber firearms. In
March 2002 the
VPC caused the California State Assembly, Public Safety Committee to
consider and reject the
issue by a 5 to 0 with 1 abstaining vote.
Regrettably, the same material has been presented to your city council. I
personally attended
the council meeting in Los Angeles regarding attempts to bar ownership of
the .50 caliber
rifle in your city. I was allowed to briefly address the council. The tone
of the discussion
was mostly emotionally based, so the facts that I attempted to provide were
ineffective to the
extent they were heard at all. The council voted to have the city attorney
draft an ordinance
to ban the .50, and further, to instruct the city's representatives in
Sacramento and in
Washington D.C. to push for bans at their respective levels.
At that council meeting, I was very surprised to see an LAPD officer
seated front and center with a Barrett
82A1 .50 cal rifle. It was the centerpiece of the discussion. As you know,
there have been no crimes
committed with these rifles, and most importantly, current California law
does not allow the sale of the
M82AI in the state because of its detachable magazine and features that
make it an "assault weapon."
This rifle was being deceptively used by your department. The officer
portrayed it as a sample of a
currently available .50 cal rifle, available for sale to the civilians of
Los Angeles. One councilman even
questioned how this rifle was available under current laws, but as I
stated, facts were ineffective that day.
Your officer, speaking for the LAPD, endorsed the banning of this rifle and
its ammunition. Then he
used the rifle for photo ops with the Councilmen each of whom, in handling
the firearm, may have been
committing a felony. I was amazed.
Since 1968, with the closing of the U.S. Springfield Amory, all of the
small arms produced for the various
government agencies are from the private sector. Every handgun, rifle or
shotgun that law enforcement
needs comes from this firearms industry. Unless the City of Los Angeles has
plans of setting up its own
firearms manufacturing, it may need to guard the manufacturing sources it
has now.
When I returned to my office from Los Angeles, I found an example of our
need for mutual
cooperation. Your department had sent one of your 82A1 rifles in to us for
service. All of my knowledge
in the use of my rifle in the field of law enforcement had been turned
upside down by witnessing how
your department used yours. Not to protect and serve, but for deception,
photo opportunities, and to
further an ill-conceived effort that may result in the use of LA taxpayer
monies to wage losing political
battles in Washington against civil liberties regarding gun ownership.
Please excuse my slow response on the repair service of the rifle. I am
battling to what service I am
repairing the rifle for. I will not sell, nor service, my rifles to those
seeking to infringe upon the
Constitution and the crystal clear rights it affords individuals to own
firearms.
I implore you to investigate the facts of the .50, to consider the
liberties of the law-abiding people and our
mutual coexistence, and to change your department's position on this issue.
Sincerely,
BARRETT FIREARMS MANUFACTURING, INC.
|